ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: TMAX 3200 scanning



One advantage of the C-41 developed B&W films is that dICE IR cleaning
works with them.

I'm somewhat surprised about the SS4000 showing ugly grain.  I have an
SS4000+ and although I don't scan a lot of B&W, it does a reasonable job
of it, IMHO.

Art

Malcolm Myers wrote:

> Berry,
>
> I am interested in buying a Minota Dimage III scanner for Velvia and T-Max
> 100.  Do you think the C41 B&W films perform better in a scanner?  I'd be
> interested to see the jpeg.
>
> Regards
>
> Malcolm
>
> Tel:  +44-(0)1473-626599
> Mob:  +44-(0)7906-056498
> Web:  http://www.analogue-precision.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Berry Ives" <yvesberia@earthlink.net>
> To: <malcolm@photovalve.freeserve.co.uk>
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 4:05 AM
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: TMAX 3200 scanning
>
>
>
>>I've had very poor results scanning TMax 400 and Ilford Delta 400 with
>>my SS4000. Terrible grain so NeatImage was a must.
>>
>
> I've had good results scanning T400 CN with a Minolta Scan Dual II.  I'll
> send a jpeg to anyone who wants to see it.
>
> Berry
>
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.