ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: 8 bit versus 16



Austin Franklin wrote:

> If you require extreme tonal curve manipulation, then I suggest you
> look at getting the image "right" on film, instead of relying on your
> image editing program to get it right for you after the fact.

I am a travel photographer in my spare time. Most of the time I come home
from a travel I can not do a second time. The films I bring home is all the
material I have. When light conditions at the moment of taking the photo
were bad, but the photo is to important to miss, the only way to use the
photo is by extreme manipulation.

>  Of course, there are some instances where this is not possible/practical.

So, in the end you admit...

:-)

--
Henk de Jong

http://www.hsdejong.nl/
Nepal and Burma (Myanmar) - Photo Galleries


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.