ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more



> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of
> Austin Franklin
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:36 AM
> To: frankparis@comcast.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more
>
>
> Hi Rob,
> Well, I've been around since long before Viewscan...and IMO,
> Viewscan was simply a scanner program that was better (in
> some instances) a LOT better than any of the programs that
> came with the low end scanners of the time...and allowed
> people to get better scans from low end scanners.

By low end scanners, do you mean something like the Polaroid SS4000?
Because VueScan produces much better scans than Polacolor Insight.

Frank Paris
frankparis@comcast.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.