Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: color negative/print film advice
I hated Portra NC myself, but UC is a world of difference.
Frank Paris
frankparis@comcast.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of Doug Franklin
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:39 PM
> To: frankparis@comcast.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: color negative/print film advice
>
>
> I've had the best results scanning @ 4k ppi using Kodak Gold
> Max. Portra 400 NC didn't work well at all (lots of chroma
> noise or grain aliasing). Supra 100, 200, and 400 were
> better than Portra NC. Royal Gold 1000 is better than Gold
> Max 800. Haven't tried Portra VC. I've got some of the new
> "High Definition" developed, but haven't scanned any of it yet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
