ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: scanner dmax discussion



Sorry!

Haven't been following this thread too closely, but if someone is using
George DeWolfe as a source, then God help them! That man is pretentious,
silly and technically inept. Every article of his contains some glaring
inaccuracy or ridiculous non-sequitur. In the last one I read (Camera
Arts?), he has a long list of Photoshop "recipes", none of which has a
title or description! "Recipe" for WHAT?

Les

> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: scanner dmax discussion
>
>
>
> >
> > "I thought I understood the relation of bit depth to dynamic range,
> > but now I'm not sure.  In the latest issue of View Camera, George
> > DeWolfe says that the maximum possible dmax for an 8 bit
> gray scale is
> > 2.4 while
> >   the maximum possible dmax of a 16 bit gray scale is 4.8.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.