ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: umax film scanners



Yes, I agree, grain aliasing is lessened by higher resolution captures,
the issue becomes one of cost versus improvement of image quality.

Art

LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
>>The SS120 scans at 4000 dpi in medium format captures
>
>
> This is/was very unclear from the Polaroid web site; but I will take your
> words for it that it does its medium format scans at 4000 dpi as well.
>
> As for the usefulness of 4000 dpi for medium format scans, I would say that
> I would agree with that for the most part.  It does have one possible
> advantage other than for extreme enlargements and extreme cropping which is
> that it gives one a lot of information to work with in Photoshop before
> downsampling and allows for the downsampling process in wither Photoshop or
> the printer to have a larger universe of data to select from in doing the
> downsampling which might provide for a better, smoother downsample with more
> details in high light and shadows or tonal gradations as a possibility.
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.