ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Digi, film and scanning in movies



> From: Brentley Beerline
>
> 2.  Bad multiplier 1.7x.  Which means that your widest
> lens is like a 30.

That just depends upon how big they want to make the chip. The Canon 10D and
Nikon D100 have a 1.6 multiplier, and they're excellent cameras.

> 3.  Image aberations, artifacts etc. that increase
> toward the edge of the frame.  Their software does a
> decent job at correcting this, but it is easy to
> demonstrate.

That's because they didn't bother to put a diffuser over the sensor to
filter the highest spatial frequencies.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.