ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] film scanner light source


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] film scanner light source
  • From: "barry" <barry@nwsca.com>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:45:27 -0500
  • Importance: Normal
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

 I ask this group does it really matter what the scanner light source is.
Some suggested to me that there were two kinds and that the Nikon IV would
be a bad choice. I suspect this would be like the old diffusion versus
condenser enlarger debate but thought I would ask anyway just in case
someone has practical experience.

Barry T




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.