ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: keeping the 16bit scans



> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of Bob Frost
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 1:30 AM
> To: frankparis@comcast.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: keeping the 16bit scans
>
>
> Frank,
>
> With regard to your last remark, I simply use a batch file
> with xcopy; when I run the batch file it copies across to the
> backup HD any files that are not there already or which have
> been altered. I'm using XP Pro, but you can still use the
> old-fashioned Dos batch files to good advantage sometimes.
>
> Bob Frost.

Conceptualy, that's the way to do it. I've actually written programs
that let me do the same thing interactively, with file browser buttons,
etc. I hate writing command lines. I'd rather write C++ code once then
use a GUI to do what you do with xcopy a thousand times with a mouse. My
UNIX son thinks I'm a whimp.

Frank Paris
frankparis@comcast.net


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.