ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: OT - Epson 1270 ink "monitor"...


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: OT - Epson 1270 ink "monitor"...
  • From: "Lucans, Gunars" <gunars@spss.com>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:24:58 -0600
  • Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
  • Thread-index: AcLYsenLxo5N1YErRyGykj+y+8NZ0gASdwHQ
  • Thread-topic: [filmscanners] Re: OT - Epson 1270 ink "monitor"...
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

> From: Arthur Entlich [mailto:artistic-1@shaw.ca]
> ...
> There are now many more profiles then when I did the tests.  I find it
> interesting that the heavy weight matte uses so little ink, relatively,
> but it may be because of the way the paper is coated prior the ink
> receptive coating.  I suspect the paper provides the majority of the
> thickness with a fairly thin receptive coating, even thinner than the
> photo ink jet papers.  I've never have used the heavy matte, 
> but now I'm
> intreged...

The Epson Heavy Weight Matte is a very nice paper and is the main one I use 
with my dye-based CIS setup.  Added bonuses: it's considerably cheaper than the 
glossy and the longevity ratings (Wilhelm) for dye inks are about 2.5 greater 
than for the glossy.

Gunars

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.