Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: JPEG2000



I tried it with a 110mb file. It took like 68 seconds to save to a 27mb
file. Not bad for a 4:1 ratio (PIII, 731mhz)

I then took the same file and archive it using WinAce. That 114mb file was
compressed to a 19mb file but it took over 4 minutes.

So for me, JPEG2000 is okay. Only one question remains: is it truly lossless
?
Thanks
Andre


>-----Original Message-----
>From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Julian Robinson
>
>Thanks for the info on this - I tried the bathroom humour national park
>professor and his students version (thanks for the link) and it was
>horrendously slow - over a minute to save a 28MB file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.