ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: DSLRs, film scans and color (was: is this aboutas goodasitgets?)



>> ... images on The Nutcracker
>> (dance photos web pages) are a mix of film and D60, indoor
>> theatre-stage lighting.
>
>The stage pictures are excellent - colour wise and composition,
>as someone who used to do this kind of work ... well, Im yet again
>jealous. (3200 ASA/B&W)
>
>With film, what lens/exposure/film rating are you working at,
>what film? And how the hell do you get the colour out so effectively!!

Most recently Fuji NPZ 800 film.  Before that, Fuji NHG-II 800; 1999 and 
earlier Kodak PMZ (1000) and Royal Gold 1000.  Lenses are 2.8, 70-200 and 
28-70; sometimes 50mm 1.8.  People and action change so rapidly on stage that I 
usually use camera auto; I'll underexpose half a stop, even a full stop if 
needed in very low light scenes.  I like to get 1/125 or faster but sometimes 
have to settle for as slow as 1/30.  (I do discard a lot of frames when I do 
that!)  Color from film comes from Vuescan and Photoshop -- and a lot of 
learning curve on how to work with color -- to know what is feasible and what 
is not, and to use the tools (which was the point I wanted to emphasize in my 
earlier post).

>Of course, being there and having memory of the scene must help.

Yes, it does indeed.  I really think it's a case of "know your subject."  I was 
familiar with dance and technical theatre before I did any serious photography, 
so the process was in part how to apply photo equipment and processes to 
realize what I wanted to capture in images.

>And if its negative film, do the prints do the negatives justice?
>Or is it the scanning that gets the full effect?

Prints are OK; but prints can never reflect all that is in the negs.  Negative 
scans (Nikon LS-30/Vuescan) yield much more -- more than can be printed, of 
course; but this lets me be the lab tech and decide color balance and where to 
make the necessary compromises when producing prints.
--
Bob Shomler
http://www.shomler.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.