ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Newish Digital Tech



> From: Austin Franklin
>
> I’d believe that PMTs have a much lower noise floor than CCDs and that is
> the reason for the much higher dynamic range, and obviously better shadow
> detail.  Is that what you are talking about?
>
> As far CCD sensitivity...CCDs have a minimum number of photons before they
> can “register”, but I believe that once that level is reached,
> “most” of the
> photons that hit the sensing area are being “counted”
> (accumulated)...I don’
> t believe they are doing “nothing”?

Maybe. I'm surprised Kennedy hasn't jumped in--he might know. Or is he even
on this list?

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.