ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: shoot first, fix it later



> Large format gives you better shadows mainly because a bellows
> does a much better job of
> controling internal reflections than the surfaces in a smaller
> camera do, resulting in less
> veiling glare, and more differentiation in your shadows.

Do you have any actual proof of this, or any reference you can point me to
that shows this to be true?  I understand the premise, but I just don't
believe it.  I shoot 35/MF and have shot a lot of LF, and have not found
what you say to be true for the cameras I've used.

> Regarding an AD page being at most 4000 x 6000 - yeah, you can
> get that resolution out of
> 35mm, but the pixels are not 100% good information--at that kind
> of resolution some portion
> of the information in each dot is grain not to mention blur--even
> if your scanner really is
> optically resolving 4000dpi , it probably isn't at anywhere near
> 100% MTF.

That depends on what film you are talking about.  For most films above 160
ISO I'd agree, but I don't agree with that for a lot of the 100 ISO films I
use, and I scan at 5080.

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.