ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: bottom-line, real-world answers on firewire 35mm film scanners for mac


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: bottom-line, real-world answers on firewire 35mm film scanners for mac
  • From: "Bernie Kubiak" <bkubiak@attbi.com>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:57:10 -0400
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <c9.27db72e3.2aaa620c@aol.com>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

Polaroid.

-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of
Trocoazone@aol.com
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:55 PM
To: bkubiak@attbi.com
Subject: [filmscanners] bottom-line, real-world answers on firewire 35mm
film scanners for mac

    i’ve been researching firewire 35mm film scanners for mac. have
read 
conflicting opinions; getting more input. can anyone give me a
real-world, 
hands-on rating of the nikon super coolscan 4000ED vs. polaroid
sprintscan 
4000plus vs. microtek artixscan 4000TF vs. minolta dimage scan elite II?
is 
this microtek model IDENTICAL internally to this polaroid model or are
any 
differences negligible? from all the specs i could track down, they look

close. seems since polaroid is on shakey ground, one may as well
consider the 
artixscan. or not? or another?
    also, does anyone have an insider email address to minolta’s film
scanner 
engineering/development dept? sure would be nice if they made a unit to 
compete in this range. the minolta dimage scan elite II has gotten good 
reviews, but, of course, it’s only 2820dpi. the dimage scan multi  pro

4800dpi is too expensive just for 35mm film.
    things that have muddied the waters in my decision-making process:  
real-world scanning speeds vs. claims. color management claims. amb
iguous/non-standardized values/scales - eg, Dmax, dynamic range, 
optical density, maximum density - eg, microtek touts 4.3 Maximum
Optical 
Density, 4.2 Dmax, 3.8D maximum density. merits of digital ICE, ROC, GEM
vs. 
limitations/faults. CCD/cold-light illumination source vs. collimated
source. 
42-bit A/D conversion vs 48-bit output. minolta unit's 48-bit A/D, 4.8 
dynamic range, unknown Dmax, 2820dpi vs microtek unit's 42-bit A/D,
ambiguous 
3.8-4.3 density, 4.2 Dmax, 4000dpi. PolaColor Insight Pro 5.5 vs.
ScanWizard 
Pro 6 TX vs. Dimage Scan software vs. Nikon Scan 3.1.3. SilverFast Ai
5.5 vs. 
hamrick vuescan. looking for cut-to-the-chase, bottom-line, real-world 
answers. thanks much!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message
title or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.