ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Density vs Dynamic range>AUSTIN (2a)



The issue is whether or not you need frequency response down to DC. A
scanner obviously does, because a series of alternating black and gray lines
looks different from a series of alternating gray and white lines, even
though they have the same AC component.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

> From: Anthony Atkielski
>
> But samples are not signals, and DC is not a signal.  A current or voltage
> that does not vary (i.e., DC) carries no information, and is thus not a
> signal.  All signals are AC.  More precisely, all signals vary
> over time; DC
> does not vary over time; therefore DC and signals are mutually exclusive.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.