Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Density vs Dynamic range - Marks out of ten
- To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] Density vs Dynamic range - Marks out of ten
- From: "" <deedee@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:20 +0100 (BST)
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
The picture painted by Julian Vrieslander did it for me.
10 out of 10.
Snip
>> The signal could have been anything between (x - 0.0005) and
>> (x + 0.0005). So the optimum "granularity" is a sampling
>> system with (2.5 -(-2.5))/0.001 = 5000 steps.
snip
Well done to all the runners up.
Next year, everyone will be supplied with the same size magnifying glass.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
