On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 11:56:29 -0500, you wrote:
>Theoretically maybe; but out of curiosity, how does one do this in actuality
>when one would have to first decompress the JPG file before one could carry
>out the sharpening operations. Afterwhich, one would then recompress the
>file again in its altered state which would be what typically causes the
>artifacts and deterioration in JPG files to begin with?
Yes, I realized after I typed that what I actually do is resize the
TIFF, edit, * sharpen * and THEN go to JPEG. It's in this resized
TIFF that I see the increased sharpening or USM effects, over the raw
intitial file.
Ken Durling
Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
