Don't do it.
I had an SS4000 and it with an LS-400 (4000ED). The Polaroid is a better
scanner. Better shadow detail. Crisper -- no depth of field problem.
The advantage of the Nikon is DIce, which I rarely use, and the bulk film
loader (optional and expensive) which I just flat love. Being able to scan
36 negs at a time is wonderful.
If Polaroid had ever been able to build the loader they kept promising, they
would have taken over the market.
Tom
I am sure this has been hashed over and over, but I am new to this
group.
I actually already have a Polaroid Sprintscan 4000, but after seeing the
results
of the Digital Ice, it convinced me to replace it :-(
I am looking at a new Coolscan 4000, and have a couple of questions. If
you
want reply off list.
1. I have seen prices all over the map for this one, any suggestions on
a good deal from a reputable supplier?
2. Comments Positive or Negative about this scanner.
Thanks,
Jim Christensen
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
