Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Flatbeds for 6x6 negs.



Steve,

this is very interesting. Does anyone know about places on the web where
scans from these two scanners are compared?

Alessandro Pardi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: steven.chambers@btinternet.com
> [mailto:steven.chambers@btinternet.com]
> Sent: mercoled 22 maggio 2002 18.53
> To: alessandro.pardi@inferentiadnm.com
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Flatbeds for 6x6 negs.
> 
> 
> Charles,
> 
> I use the Expression 1680 pro. The purchase was made just 
> after the 2450 was
> launched in the UK - my decision to go for the 1680 was based on a
> discussion with technical support at Epson - the question to 
> them was what
> do you get for your money in the 1680 Pro over that found in 
> the 2450. They
> highlighted 3 main issues :
> 
> 1. Dual focus mechanism
> 2. Higher Dmax
> 3. Higher quality interpolation in the scanner when used 1600x3200.
> 
> I do not regret the purchase. I have no focus problems and no 
> issue with
> noise. The scans a as sharp as a tack.
> 
> Steve Chambers
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of
> c.k.christacopoulos@dundee.ac.uk
> Sent: 21 May 2002 16:47
> To: steven.chambers@btinternet.com
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Flatbeds for 6x6 negs.
> 
> 
> ** Reply to note from filmscanners@halftone.co.uk Tue, 21 May 2002
> 08:03:25 -0400
> 
> 
> > I agree as well. We have a Umax Powerlock III in the lab 
> and are using it
> > as an intergral part of a piece of test equipment for measuring film
> > resolution/MTFetc. Good choice
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Everyone with Umax Powerlook III seems happy.  The reason I 
> was finding the
> Epson 1680 more interesting is that is does 1600x3200 dpi as 
> opposed to the
> Umax 1200x2400.
> 
> Will that extra resolution of the Epson transfer anything 
> from the negative
> to the electronic image or will it just generate more noise?
> 
> Ta.
> Charles
> 
> ==============================================
> Charles Christacopoulos, Management Information Officer,
> Planning & Information Group, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN,
> Scotland, United Kingdom.
> Tel: 44(0)1382-344891. Fax: 44(0)1382-201604.
> http://www.somis.dundee.ac.uk/ http://somis2.ais.dundee.ac.uk/
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> ------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the 
> message title
> or body
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 
> 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the 
> message title or body
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.