Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: 3 year wait
On Sun, 12 May 2002 18:29:47 -0700 Mike Kersenbrock (michaelk@aracnet.com)
wrote:
> No, although "addressable" as a 4K, it's quite a bit less as you
> suggest. However, it's not really "bad" unless you're looking for
> sharply focused images. You'll get images but a bit fuzzy if critically
> inspected. Depends what one is using it for. The 5000/500s is made
> for doing power-point sorts of images, and it'll do those great. Photos
> it'll do "okay" but as I said, not crisp/sharp. Okay for presentations
> or family get-togethers, probably less good for critical uses.
|
