Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: Scanning negs vs. slides
> > If they print more tones (or with tonal separation
> > equal to or less) than your eye can discern, then
> > why isn't that enough?
>
> They have to be the _same_ tones, not just more tones. And in any case,
> they can't do that. Printed paper is a very poor display medium,
> with many
> constraints.
Are you trying to claim that the number of tones that paper is capable of is
LESS than your eyes are capable of?
BTW, what do you believe makes paper a "very poor display medium"? And
compared to WHAT?
Austin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
