ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Tri-X on Nikon 4000



Steve writes:

> The few other Tri-X pics I've scanned have all
> printed okay - must have been an "interesting"
> day at the lab .

A local one-hour lab where I work will develop and print B&W in just 60
minutes.  They use a machine with high-speed Ilford chemistry to develop B&W
in a few minutes.  Their printing equipment is matched to the developing
equipment, so when they make prints from the developed negatives, it all
looks okay; but when I have them develop the film and I try to scan it
myself, I get really, really bad results (heavy grain, images way, way too
light).  I finally started developing my own B&W, given that it's pretty
easy, and now I get extremely nice scans--way less grain, and much smoother
tones and better distributed luminosities.  What a difference!



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.