ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Scanning negs vs. slides



Alex writes ...

> ..., I thought it would be worthwhile to check it out shooting
> similar images simultaneously on slides and negs,
> scan then on my IV ED and then to make final decision.
>

  For many subjects you may find very little difference.  Theoretically, any
difference with slides should be attributed to their optical density and the
possible number of f/stops.  Slides are usually attributed with an optical
density of not much more than '3', which limits the number of f/stops to
~10.  Negatives, on the other hand, are claimed to have the potential for
~14 f/stops.

  10 f/stops is a considerable amount of contrast, and should hardly ever
exceed normal subject matter, ... but you might run into problems achieving
shadow detail for a properly exposed sun-lit & snow-filled scene.

cheerios ... shAf  :o)
Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland
www.micro-investigations.com (in progress)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.