ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon LS8000vs.MinoltaScanMulti Pro!



To be honest David I had some very clean negs that didn't need any real
cleaning so I did not use the IR cleaning under Vuescan.  I have heard
people report varying amounts of success with it though.

ICE is, as you say, impressive.  The major plus for me using Vuescan with
multisampling was the reduction in the pepper grain apparent when scanning
Fuji Provia film.  Someone on another forum has had a response from Fuji
following the submission of some scans and they accept that the Multi Pro is
picking up emulsion flaws and that they will investigate the cause of the
pepper grain being on the emulsion.

Now where is David S.  He got me wondering if I am choosing the best scanner
now and he has gone silent on us ;-)

Simon

On 7/4/02 3:36 pm, "David J. Littleboy" <davidjl@gol.com> wrote:

>
> "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com> writes:
>>>>>>>>
> I have definitely found that my negs scanned with much less noise/grain
> using Vuescan rather than the Minolta software, and that multisampling
> helped greatly.
> <<<<<<<<
>
> How well did you fin IR cleaning in Vuescan to work with the Minolta? (I
> found David S's ICE examples incredibly impressive. ICE is definately an
> amazing trick.)
>
> David J. Littleboy
> davidjl@topic.drift.com
> Tokyo, Japan

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.