ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Is the ICE feature in Scanwit 2740S any good?



I've read that the ICE feature is added to the scanner by implementing some
hardware components (a chip and an infrared sensor).
Theoretically if the scanner manufacturers buy these components from the
same source (Applied Science Fiction) ICE should perform with the same
results on all scanners, but obviously this is not happening practically.
There are also many versions of this system.
That's why I come back to my initial question: how does the ICE system in
the Scanwit 2740S perform? It is worth it?
My 2420S gives me great results but I started to be fed up by the effort I
put in manually cleaning the images in PS.
Although I always blow the film with a Dust Away can, there is an incredible
amount of particles that remain on film and cannot be seen with the naked
eye.

Thanks to all contributors that answered my posts

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.