ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: X rays was Digital PIC




> For that matter, at least
> in the
> US & Canada, the prospects of serious litigation from pregnant
> passengers
> has to limit the gate exposure. Checked baggage, which has no such
> limitation, can be deadly. Never place unprocessed film in your
> checked
> baggage.
> Hersch

There are definitely limitations. As a matter of fact, one of the not
simple problems is designing heavy lead curtains that can be pulled up
and pushed down fast enough to achieve acceptable throughput of
suitcases. The bigger the aperture of the scanner the more effort it
takes to design that mechanism.

Robert

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.