ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Scanner image adjustments vs. Photoshop


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Scanner image adjustments vs. Photoshop
  • From: "" <Bobgoldstein@aol.com>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:14:51 EST
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

What are the pro's and con's of making image adjustments in Vuescan or
Silverfast versus making them later in Photoshop, using a raw scan?

I have the impression that using a brightness adjustment on a preview
scan results in a physically different exposure for the final scan,
obviously something that can't be done later in the workflow.  But for
all the other image characteristics, can one make adjustments just as
well in Photoshop?

I am using an SS4000, sometimes with Vuescan, sometimes with Polacolor
insight 5.5, but always followed by tinkering in Photoshop before
printing.

Bob Goldstein  408/253-4489



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.