ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Minolta Scan Multi Pro (was focus problems)


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Minolta Scan Multi Pro (was focus problems)
  • From: "Roger Smith" <rsmith@unb.ca>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:57:01 -0400
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

At 4:39 AM -0800 3/21/02, Arthur Entlich wrote:
>I can't refer to the Minolta Multi Pro because I haven't used it, don't
>know anyone personally who owns one, and no one has yet sent me any
>sample scans to test.
>
>But I know the Dimage II.  And I shoot 98% slides, and I still have the
>problem with the Minolta, and it also happens with dirt and dust, not
>just grain.
>
>Art
>
>David Harris wrote:
>
>>  Please remember that these exaggerations only seem to
>>  occur when scanning negatives, I wonder if that is
>  > significant?

        I agree with Art that slides also show exaggerated dust and scratches.

At 10:41 AM +1100 3/21/02, Op's wrote:
>This I assume is with the Minolta software.  Whats it like with Vuescan?

        I am using VueScan. The Minolta software also seems to
produce more shadow noise, so VueScan has an advantage there, too.

Regards,
Roger Smith

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.