ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: New price on Flextight Photo in UK




> Although I agree that hardware sharpening, or even non-disclosed
> software sharpening, is problematic in testing for non-sharpened images
> in analyzing sharpness, I question the value of looking at a
> non-sharpened image in terms of determining which scanner has higher
> resolution,

Hi Art,

We weren't talking about resolution, but sharpness...as the statement was:

"None of them could match the Imacon scanner in sharpness..."

Though I don't believe what you said above was relevant to the issue being
discussed, your point is correct.  Sharpening won't increase resolution,
just sharpness ;-)

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.