ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Digital ICE



> I, naively perhaps, have often thought that simple things like 'sensor
> motion blur' and 'scanner shake' might have something to do with it. When
> looking and listening to my LS4000 scanning, I start to wonder
> how long the
> sensors actually stays still, and how this relates to the length
> of time of
> the exposure of the sensors.

Hi Bob,

The scanner SHOULD be designed so the sensor etc. is motionless (as in
paused) when the exposure is taken.  This shouldn't be an issue...if the
scanner is designed right.  Good thought though!

It's not the sensor that moves, obviously, but the film.  Exposure can vary
drastically, but it's in the millisecond range, like 6-60 if I remember
right.

Austin


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.