ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Anyone Have Experience WithGrainSurgerySoftware?


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Anyone Have Experience WithGrainSurgerySoftware?
  • From: "" <BobGldstn@aol.com>
  • Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 23:03:51 EST
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

What's NEAT??


In a message dated 12/30/01 3:44:13 PM, mlidaka@ameritech.net writes:

>I am trying out the demo and I have not been impressed either.  I am more
>impressed with NEAT.
>
>Maris
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Mark T." <markthomasz@ozemail.com.au>
>To: <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
>Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 5:01 PM
>Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Anyone Have Experience WithGrainSurgerySoftware?
>
>
>FWIW my experiments with the demo of this software left me *very* cold.
>
>It seems quite effective on patterned images (eg flatbed scans from
>textured paper).  However, I found it to have little benefit on normal
>grain - when it was adjusted up enough to be any 'better' than the usual
>grain softening techniques, it introduced strange vertical streaks and
>other artefacts.  Plus the effect is inconsistent, giving a very odd look
>to the images.  Vuescan's grain removal is far more usable, I think.
>
>Maybe I just didn't get the hang of it?  But I wasn't all that impressed
>with their demo images either (is it just me, or does the 'grain' look
>a
>little fake..?), so that must be a bad sign.  Too fussy, perhaps - but
>at
>that price I'd want something a lot better.
>
>mt
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------
>Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in
>the title or body
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------
>Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in
>the title or body
>
>
>----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
>Return-Path: <filmscanners-owner@halftone.co.uk>
>Received: from  rly-zd03.mx.aol.com (rly-zd03.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.227])
>by air-zd03.mail.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILINZD37-1230184412;
>Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:44:12 -0500
>Received: from  tsphoto (wan-a-97.adsl.alcom.co.uk [212.47.80.97]) by
rly-zd03.mx.aol.com
>(v83.18) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINZD38-1230184355; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:43:55
>-0500
>X-Envelope-From: mlidaka@ameritech.net
>Message-ID: <001e01c19188$c166bcc0$b55dfea9@ameritech.net>
>References: <5.0.2.1.1.20011231092003.01b12c10@pop.ozemail.com.au>
>Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:21:48 -0600
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
>X-Envelope-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>X-UIDL: _4CH.MH6L8.sulphur
>Sender: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
>Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>To: BobGldstn@aol.com
>Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Anyone Have Experience WithGrainSurgerySoftware?
>
>


Bob Goldstein
22483 McClellan Road
Cupertino, CA 95014
408 253-4489

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in the 
title or body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.