ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] VS vs. NS Cleaning



Hi!

I think that both Vuescan and Digital ICE don't work very well with
Kodachrome slides, which has also been stated many times. As far as I know
Digital ICE softens the image, while Vuescan does not. So I'd suggest that
applying som additional filter (dust and scratches) in Photoshop may help. I
use GIMP (under Linux) mostly, which has a Despeckle filter which, according
to my experince, is much superior to 'dust and scratches' in PhotoShop.

Best regards

Erik

fredagen den 28 december 2001 21.46 skrev du:
> ok, here's the comparison of VS v NS using the LS4000ED, with positive and
> negative examples:
>       http://members.home.net/szturn/
> It seems to me that VueScan wins hands down for color fidelity and overall
> image quality, but NikonScan is ever so slightly better than VS for IR
> cleaning, especially for (positive) slides. Personally I'm staying with VS
> for everything unless a slide is very dirty, in which case I'll use NS and
> spend the time trying to match VS's color fidelity in PS.

--
Erik Kaffehr                erik.kaffehr@swipnet.se alt. ekr@ksu.se
Mariebergsvägen 53          +46 155 219338 (home)
S-611 66 Nyköping           +46 155 263515 (office)
Sweden                      -- Message sent using 100% recycled electrons --

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in the 
title or body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.