ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: DCS Pro back vs. Imacon 4040



Regarding ccd and camera back
The new Sinar. Light Phase, Imacon and Kodak  are all from now , using Kodak 
4040 ccd in their camera back. All are functional but with different 
results.
I got this message from a friend who have been testing all of them except 
the Kodak back.  Imacon + Sinar  can  also been   used in 4 shot mode for 
full color information. Kodak
and Light Phase can only be used as 1 shot.
Kodak  is much more mobile, it has 2 CF slots and LCD screen.
Mikael Risedal




>From: "Mikael Risedal" <risedal@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: DCS Pro back vs. Imacon 4040
>Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 14:17:08
>
>I dont think they use the same chip. Imacon often use Phillips ccd and 
>Kodak
>use their own ccd.
>I have tried the Imacon  back and like all Imacon products its working
>excellent.
>I have not heard from any proo that Kodak back is functional all right up 
>to
>this date
>Mikael Risedal
>
>
>>From: Andrea de Polo <andrea@alinari.it>
>>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>>Subject: filmscanners: DCS Pro back vs. Imacon 4040
>>Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 12:55:12 +0100
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>sorry if I keep posting this kind of questions:
>>
>>If a photo archive like us must to make 150.000 reproductions of 19th and
>>20th Century images, and quality and speed are important, what you will
>>suggest between the Kodak DCS Pro back and the new Imacon 4040 (they 
>>carry,
>>I think, the same chip).
>>
>>I think that Imacon software is indeed very good and full support for
>>ColorSync ICC; what about the Kodak? Also is and simple as Imacon (and 
>>with
>>similar features, like full ColorSync support)?
>>
>>And what about pricing?
>>
>>In Italy I can get the Imacon back for about 25,000 $ Dollars; what about
>>the Kodak?
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>>Andrea
>>--
>>------------------------------------------------
>>Fratelli Alinari Photo Archives and Museum
>>http://www.alinari.com
>>The world's oldest picture library
>>tel: +39-055-2395201
>>gsm: +39-347-4883223
>>fax: +39-055-2382857
>>------------------------------------------------
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Hämta MSN Explorer kostnadsfritt på http://explorer.msn.se
>

_________________________________________________________________
Hämta MSN Explorer kostnadsfritt på http://explorer.msn.se




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.