ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: RAID and scratch



on 11/17/01 7:51 PM, Charles Knox wrote:

> In general, the RAID partition would be faster, but not by as much as you
> might think, since it would also be creating more seeks on the primary
> drive, thus slowing it down quite a bit.


Thanks Charles

In this case I might not bother. Since I'm paying so much more for RAID , if
it's not going to give me much better performance used in that way I'd
rather put that precious space to use in a way that maximizes it's
effectiveness.

Todd 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.