Dave wrote:
>is simply more grain in some areas of the negative than others. I
>wonder if this is due to some sort of "stacking" effect (Austin?),
>whereby areas with dyes closer to the color of the base appear
>grainier.
Tony - are you around? Tony mentioned something about different grain being
more or less visible in different areas of the film. I thin it was in response
to a comment I made about how variable the grain is in T400CN. Grain in
shadows is very coarse, while in highlights it's virtually non-existent.
I think it had something to do with which emulsion layers were most sensitive
to which intensities of light and therefore what got removed in processing?
Rob
Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
