Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI



In this context, you are right on Denise. Regards, Ron
----- Original Message -----
From: "Denise E. Kissinger" <neselain@swbell.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI


> The Canon Elan is an excellent camera (I have one) and everyone knows that
> it's the quality of the lens not the camera that you need.!!!!!!!!
>
> Denise
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul Graham <peegee@btinternet.com>
> To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:06 PM
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI
>
>
> > well thats an astonishing amount of work on this site, and very
> interesting
> > reading,
> > but what dropped my jaw was that he did the tests on a
> > Canon Elan with a Canon 28-105mm lens
> > to judge the quality of 35mm vs 5x4" (among other things) with this is
> > plainly ridiculous
> > I'm not trying to be a snob here, but really, you gotta get hold of a
good
> > pro 35mm camera before doing such tests,
> >
> > paul
> >
> > http://www.users.qwest.net/~rnclark/scandetail.htm
> >
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.