ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Re: Canon 4000 ppi film scanner report



At 12:57 AM +1030 11/1/01, Mark T. wrote:
>In dark areas of slides a lot of that dynamic range is marred by 
>noise.  Admittedly it is 'nice' noise (?), ie it's very fine, very 
>even, and not streaky, but it means that for a person like me who 
>uses transparencies mostly, and has a bad habit of underexposing 
>them, this isn't the 4000 dpi scanner for me.

        Mark, have you tried the FS4000 with VueScan? Both Art 
Entlich and I noticed with the Minolta Scan Dual II that scans done 
with the native software were noisier in the shadows than the same 
slides scanned with VueScan.
        I was interested to see you liked negative scans on the 
FS4000. I've always had trouble getting good negative scans with the 
Minolta, so I await your fuller report with interest.

Regards,
Roger Smith




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.