ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.



> Whether in the real world it is preferable to adjust image colors
> using 16 bits per channel rather than 8 bits per channel has been
> a long standing argument.

It is a fact that it is "preferable" to make tonal moves using 16 bits per
channel.  Whether you can detect the difference is yet another story, and is
largely based on what you are outputting to, and the size of your tonal
corrections.  With today's better inkjet outputs (especially Piezo B&W) you
certainly can see a huge difference on images that you are making large
tonal corrections to.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.