ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000?



Of course, waying the other pos and cons, i.e. technical support, reliability 
issues
Polaroid vs Nikon.

Barbara & Martin Greene wrote:

> Jim
>
> I have not done a count, but I'm sure that I also find from 200- 1000 spots
> on every scan, no matter how careful I am, and I live in a humid climate,
> but work under much less clean conditions.   I've been preoccupied with the
> dust problem for some time.  Some people don't seem to consider it a big
> problem, but that must be because they do not spot scans from slides using
> the Acutal Pixels view while making 13x19 prints.  I'd hoped that a new
> SS4000 purchased at Ecost would do a good enough job and save me lots of
> bucks.  But, the comparison between using ICE on a Nikon LS 4000 and not ICE
> on the Sprintscan is too dramatic to ignore, especially since I have not
> been able to see any significant difference in quality.
>

--
Jim Hayes






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.