ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ?



Gordon writes ...

>  ...  I have read in several places (including
> this list) that certain printers are "set" for lack of a better
> word or optimized to certain value of DPI.  ...

  Modern printers are definitely approaching "fine" resolutions.  If you put
criteria like is common to "fine" B/W prints on today's printers ... say, 7
lines/mm, ... which equates to ~180 pixel pairs per inch, ... then you
realize there isn't much point in sending finer than 300 pixels/in
resolutions to your printer.

shAf  :o)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.