ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: NikSharpener Pro



Well, now that I am done building the pages, I admit that contrary to my
initial optimism, when I view the completed pages, they are oversharpened.
Darn.  I wanted this to work better. I'll play with it some more, but I
suspect I've thrown away the money.

I'll look into what you just suggested.

Tom> At 19:24 09-09-01 +0000, you wrote:
> >I find
> >Nik Sharpener utterly useless-- it ALWAYS oversharpens, no matter what
> >settings I use.
>
>
> Agreed. I've seen it in action and think it's grossly overpriced for what
> little it does as opposed to custom Photoshop actions or packages like
> UltraSharpenPro.
>
> >  I can do a better job with careful settings on PS's USM
> >tool, sharpening individual channels, etc. The BEST way is to use one of
the
> >PS Actions that creates a custom edge mask for you image before you apply
> >USM. I forget the URL for Johnny's versions, but there is also a very
good
> >one from Katrin Eismann at www.digitalretouch.org.
>
>
> See ftp://ftp.pinkheadedbug.com
> and http://www.pinkheadedbug.com/links.html
>
>





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.