ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: NikSharpener Pro



Isn't this "boundary" the halo that USM is built upon? The idea of USM (and
this is way to short an explanation) is to introduce just such edge contrast
around and/or between objects and transition zones. The width of these halos
are controlled by the Radius slider in the USM dialog box. Try decreasing
your Radius substantially to see if that helps.

Also check out these two articles:

http://www.creativepro.com:80/story/feature/11242.html

http://www.creativepro.com:80/story/feature/12189.html

Todd


> Brian,
> 
> Honestly, it is too soon for me to answer than question. The scanning I've
> done with it so far has been low-res web scanning.  I certainly haven't
> noticed the boundary problems you described. I have not, however, scanned
> for printing at full resolution.  Once I do that, I'll let post more
> results.  For the purpose I've used it so far, I've been very pleased.
> 
> Tom
> 
>> Tom,
>> I find your comments intriguing. Could I ask a few questions? I find
>> that when I sharpen using Photoshop tools, there is oftentimes an
> artificial
>> dark or light line (sharpening artifact) that appears at the juxtaposition
>> or boundary of a dark and light area. This causes me to spend a good deal
> of
>> time cleaning these things up. Does this this sharpening plugin eliminate
>> this problem? If it does I would say the price was worth it. I would be
> most
>> interested in your observations on this.
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
> 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.