On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 18:10:40 -0400 SKID Photography (skid@bway.net) wrote:
> My question is: Do I look at the 6000 or the 2000 for the bottom line
> actual optical resolution? I always
> thought that if they said 6000 x 2000, that the 2000 number was the high
> end of the resolution.
That is the only safe assumption. The 6000 will be achieved by 1/3rd pixel
stepping and fancy footwork in firmware which generally amounts to quality
somewhere between interpolation and optical res of 6000, but closer to the
former than the latter.
Regards
Tony Sleep
- Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info
& comparisons
