ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging




--- Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
<snip>
> And remember, it only has to be
> blasted with
> x rays once to be ruined--you might be shooting with film that has
> already been
> fogged.

Wrong. You don't know what you are talking about. Don't spread rumors
that are not true. 
To everybody else, never put film in check-in bagage. The x-ray
machines for carry-on luagage for almost all countries in the world are
film-save except for very high-speed film or many times of scanning. In
most countries you can ask for hand-inspection although the laws don't
mandate it (put it in clear zip-lockers, out of the canister or in
transparent canisters). Also, the x-ray machines used for the carry-on
laguage expose the film evenly while the CT-machines don't. Therefore,
it is much harder to detect any problem with the 'regular' x-rays then
the one's from the CT scanners. Also, the later ones work in a quite
different way then the 'regular' x-rays which is why they are more
dangerous to film.

Robert

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.