ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: supra 400



I have had great results scanning Sura 400 with both a
Canon 2710 and Minolta Scan Elite. I really like this
as my general purpose film, in fact.


Pat

--- John Matturri <jmatturr@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need
> to get
> decent scans of. Using my SS4000 I get terrible
> grain
> aliasing making the quality unacceptable. I was
> thinking
> that I would have to bite the bullet and get drum
> scans
> made, but it occurs to me that if aliasing is an
> interference pattern based on ccd size a smaller ccd
> cell
> size might solve the problem. Has anyone had good
> results
> with this film with a 2750 (or whatever) dpi
> scanner,
> especially the Nikon?
> 
> j
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.