ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Too picky?



My Scanwit does not have any lazy or dead sensors.. it would be an intolerable
condition since every scan would need Photoshop retouching... I can tolerate a
few dead pixels on a monitor screen or a digital camera, but with a scanner you
will end up with a line the whole length of the image.. yuchh!!

Arthur Entlich <artistic@ampsc.com>  wrote:

>For people who do NOT have Minolta Dual Dimage II scanners, do you have
>one or more lazy or bad sensors in your CCD array, and if so, do you
>consider that an acceptable defect and have you decided not to exchange
>it?

Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.