Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras -wedding/commercial photography

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: RE: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras -wedding/commercial photography
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 10:48:41 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3B877D4D.367061DA@ampsc.com>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk


> Of course, the loupe-heads will be
> unhappy with a 100 dpi image, but, if it is a large format print, only
> bad manners says you should be scrutinizing it at 8", anyway.

Or, that's where you just happen to be standing ;-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras -wedding/commercial photography
  - From: Arthur Entlich <artistic@ampsc.com>

References:
- Re: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras -wedding/commercial photography
  - From: Arthur Entlich <artistic@ampsc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!!
Next by Date: Re: Getting around the firewire problem was Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!!
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras -wedding/commercial photography
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras -wedding/commercial photography
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread