ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: =?iso-8859-1?Q?IT8=20Calibration=20was=20Re=3A=20filmscanners=3A



On Mon, 6 Aug 2001 09:15:55 +1000  =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rob=20Geraghty?= 
(harper@wordweb.com) wrote:

> For the purchase price of Vuescan it might be worth trying with the 
> SS4000
> just to see how much difference calibration really makes?
> 
> It occurs to me to wonder how much difference IT8 calibration on a film
> scanner makes?

Vuescan is based on IT8 calibration, but it's hard-coded into the program 
and not something the user can do for their individual scanner. IME 
differences between examples of the same scanner are very small, so this is 
not a significant downside. However Ed did comment a while back that, as 
you'd expect, there's more variation at the budget end of the market. 
Paradoxically, cheap scanners would benefit more from individual 
characterisation.

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info 
& comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.