ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan question



Other than personal preference, the only benefit I see is that you can see
the image better in Photopaint/PS and have more features available with
which to make various adjustments, including changing to different color
spaces, and have the information panel available.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Woolfenden" <swoolf@global.co.za>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan question


| I prefer to
| > fine-tune color, contrast and everything else in post-scan processing in
| > Photopaint or Photoshop or PSP or whatever your favorite program is.
|
| Thanks Maris  - is their any benefit to be had by doing things this way as
| opposed to doing it up-front? Other than , I suppose , when scanning a
batch
| of stuff using the same parameters ?
| Steve
|
|




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.